Sohil v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33291 of 2026

Sohil

			.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Gaurav Srivastav	Srivastav, a	Rajesh Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 68

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

1. List has been revised. As informed by learned A.G.A., notice to the informant has been served.

1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

1. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 215 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87, 352, 64 BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Sirsaganj, District Firozabad, during the pendency of trial.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim is a consenting party as is but evident from her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. The victim, by her physical appearance, seems to be major although she has stated herself to be 17 years old.