Shyam @ Atendra v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33278 of 2026

Shyam @ Atendra

.....Applicant(s)

Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saroj Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Saroj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Shyam @ Atendra to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 282 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, 131 of BNS, P.S.- Koraon, District- Prayagraj, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in belated FIR dated 27.07.2026 lodged by Rakesh Kumar Singh for the incident occurred in the morning of 26.07.2026. It is alleged in the FIR against three persons including the accused applicant that his brother Pramod has been assaulted by the coaccused Lacchiman, the father of applicant while he has stopped him to cut the tree. Later on, the mother of informant came to rescue his brother wherein the mother of accused applicant also came and assaulted his mother. It is further contended that two injuries were suffered by Indrani and four injuries suffered by Pramod. Both have suffered no bony injury. The accused applicant has no criminal history. Charge sheet is submitted. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 31.07.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.