Rajesh @ Raju v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33267 of 2026

Rajesh @ Raju

	Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)		: Jalaj Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)		: G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Jalaj Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Rajesh @ Raju to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 391 of 2026, under Sections 333, 118(2), 115(2), 351(3), 109(1) BNS, P.S.- Meerganj, District- Bareilly, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in the FIR dated 10.08.2026 lodged by Pappu Maurya, the informant with the allegation that four accused persons including the accused/applicant have assaulted his mother, who suffered seven injuries, which are fatal in nature. It was due to old enmity as the both the parties are neighbours that the accused have assaulted. It is further contended that there is no specific role assigned to the accused/applicant. Seven injuries were shown in the medico legal report, wherein the supplementary report shows that there is no abnormality detected and all the injuries are simple in nature. The weapon used is lathi and danda. The accused/applicant has no criminal history. The investigation is continuing and he is cooperating with the investigation. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 13.08.2026. He seeks to be enlarged on bail.