Lucky Singh v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33256 of 2026

Lucky Singh

.....Applicant(s)

Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for applicant hands up supplementary affidavit annexing additional documents in support of bail application, is taken on record.

1A. Heard Sri Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Lucky Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 267 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 351(3), 191(3) of BNS, P.S.Kerakat, District- Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 29.06.2026 lodged by one of the injured Vikas Rajbhar with the allegation that there was some altercation between the injured informant and Dheeraj Yadav, later on seven named including the accused applicant and two anonymous persons had assaulted the informant. His father and uncle came to rescue him and they have also been assaulted. It is further contended that four injuries each were suffered by Vikas Rajbhar and Buddhiram Rajbhar. Three injuries suffered by Sudhiram, one is a gunshot injury. All the injuries are stated to be simple in nature in the medico legal examination report. The gunshot injury is assigned to the co-accused Dheeraj. The accused applicant has no specific role assigned in the present case. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has criminal history of two cases