Pintu Alias Vikas and Another v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33044 of 2026

Pintu Alias Vikas And Another

.....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghuraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vineet Singh Parmar

Court No. - 64

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri N.K. Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Vineet Singh Parmar, counsel for the informant. Perused the record.

1. The present bail application has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 194 of 2026, under Section 108 B.N.S., Police Station- Frinds Colony, District- Etawah during pendency of the trial.

1. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant no.1 is brother-in-law and the applicant no.2 is the father-in-law of the deceased have been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the postmortem report, cause of death is asphyxia due to antemortem hanging. Further, as per the allegations in the first information report and the material collected during the course of the investigation, the essential ingredients to constitute the offence under Section 108 B.N.S., are not made out against the applicants. Mere allegations of harassment, in absence of any positive act of instigation, intentional aid, compelling the deceased to commit suicide, do not constitute the offence of abetment to suicide. In support of his submission, counsel for the applicants has placed reliance on the judgements of the Hon'ble