Dismissed¶14

Sandeep Chauhan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bail – Second bail application

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2026BAIL/33024/2023

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.) dismissed Sandeep Chauhan's second bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33024 of 2023) against State of U.P. and 3 others for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of counsel for the applicant and first informant. Offences: Sections 363, 366, 376 & 120 B IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act; Case Crime No. 627 of 2021, P.S. Mohammadabad, District Mau. First bail application No. 17826 of 2022 had been dismissed on merit on 16.2.2023. No merits decided; no precedent discussed. A.G.A. Ashish Kr. Tripathi appeared for the State.

What did the court decide?

The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution, as no one appeared for the applicant or the first informant when the list was revised. ¶14

Sandeep Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33024 of 2023

Sandeep Chauhan

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Abhinav Prasad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A., Janardan Singh

¶9

Court No. - 72

¶10

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶11

List has been revised. No one appeared either for the applicant or the first informant. However, Sri Ashish Kr. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶12

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant in Case Crime No. 627 of 2021, under Sections 363, 366, 376 & 120 B of IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act , Police Station Mohammadabad, District Mau with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶13

This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first bail application being No. 17826 of 2022 has been dismissed by this Court on merit vide order dated 16.2.2023.

¶14

In view of the above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶15

March 18, 2026

¶16

Vandana

¶17

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Chauhan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Chauhan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Mathur vs State of U.P.

Mulayam Singh and Another vs State of U.P.

Virendra Kumar Harijan vs State of U.P. and Another

Rishikant Vs State of U.P.

Usman Vs State of U.P.

Sushant Singh Dhakrey and Another vs State of U.P. and Another