Tanveer v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32406 of 2026

Tanveer

.....Applicant(s)

		Versus
State of U.P.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Dharmendra Kumar Kumar Sharma	Mishra, Rohit
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Sri Rohit Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for applicant hands up supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history, the same is taken on record.

1A. Heard Sri Sharma, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Tanveer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 383 of 2019, under Sections 307 IPC, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Bulandshahar, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated by the police in encounter case in FIR dated 11.05.2019. There is no injury to the police person. The arrest and recovery have been made in the absence of independent witness. The applicant was initially granted bail by the Sessions court in order darted 29.05.2019. Subsequently due to Covid-19 pandemic, he could not appear before the court and was not aware about the submission of the charge sheet. After the issuance of process, he has surrendered before the court on 23.07.2026 and since then he is in jail. The accused applicant has criminal history of seventeen cases, out of which in one case, final report is submitted and in one case the applicant is enlarged on notice under Section 35(3) BNSS, in three cases he has been acquitted and remaining cases, he is on bail. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since