Surendra Singh v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32370 of 2026

Surendra Singh

.....Applicant(s)

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Anand Gangwar, Km Astha
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Sri Sunil Kumar Gaud, learned counsel holding brief for applicant hands up supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history, is taken on record.

1A. Heard Sri Gaud, learned counsel holding brief for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Surendra Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 98 of 2026, under Sections 109, 115(2), 117(2), 352 of BNS, P.S.- Bakewar, DistrictEtawah, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that FIR has been lodged by the informant against four accused persons including the accused applicant on 14.04.2026 for the incident of 12.04.2026 occurred at 14:00 hours. There is no explanation for the delay in FIR. It is alleged in the FIR that the accused person had assaulted the wife of informant namely Meera Devi with lathi, danda, Sariya, Kanta. There are thirteen injuries suffered by her including fracture of first metacarpal bone and patella bone as such in supplementary medical report four injuries were shown as grievous in nature. It is the contention of learned counsel that both the sides are of same family and there is property dispute between them and cross fight between the parties, wherein Anshika from the side of accused suffered eight injuries. Her FIR has not been lodged. She has moved an application under Section 173(4) BNSS, which was rejected.