Lucky Saini v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32349 of 2026

Lucky Saini

	Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Irshad Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Abhay Mishra, Srivastava	G.A., Prateek

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Irshad Ahmad, learned counsel for accused applicant, Sri Ankit Shukla, learned counsel holding brief for informant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Lucky Saini to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 456 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 3(5) BNS, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Moradabad, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 10.07.2026 lodged by the wife of injured with the allegation that on 09.07.2026 at about 23:00 hours, the three accused persons including the accused applicant had assaulted Navin Khanna by firearm. It is the contention of learned counsel that the specific role of firing is attributed on the co-accused Dhruv Dhawan. It is further contended that in the statement of the victim, it is stated that on the exhortation of other co-accused Dhruv Dhawan has opened fire at him. The injured suffered two entry wounds, one on his hand and another at the back of his chest. Further submits that there is monetary transaction between the parties which led to the false implication. The accused applicant has criminal history of one case wherein he is on anticipatory bail. Investigation is continuing and applicant is co-operating in the investigation. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 15.07.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on