Rajendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32250 of 2026 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA, for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of
Disposed 9 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32250 of 2026
Rajendra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Rohit Kumar Singh |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 65 |
HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
- Heard Sri Rohit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA, for the State.
- The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.279 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 131, 115(2), 352, 117(2), 351(2) and 103(1) BNS, Police Station Baraut, District Baghpat, during pendency of the trial.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is named in the FIR along with five others and according to the FIR due to dispute applicant and other accused persons with their respective weapons made assault upon the father of the informant due to which he sustained injuries but entire allegations leveled against the applicant are totally false.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/32250/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court