Ramteerath v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application under BNS, 2023 provisions for offences including murder; court took vakalatnama and supplementary affidavit on record and granted the State three weeks to file a counter affidavit with rejoinder thereafter.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3211 of 2026
Ramteerath
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Mishra, Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Shri Chandra Shekhar Shukla, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of complainant, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ramteerath
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko.
Coram
Manish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3211/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court