Chhotu @ Rajendra Kumar v. State of Up and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31408 of 2024 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard Sri J.P. Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Nirma Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manoj Gautam, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri S.K. Chaudhary,
Disposed 2 years 1 month after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31408 of 2024
Chhotu @ Rajendra Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Of Up And 3 Others | .....O |
pposite Party(s) |
||
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : | Devi Prasad Tripathi, Pandey, Manvendra Mishra |
Manish Singh, |
Kumar Nirma |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A., Gunjan Sharm Chaudhary |
a, Shiv | Karan |
Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
- Heard Sri J.P. Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Nirma Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manoj Gautam, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri S.K. Chaudhary, counsel for the informant. Perused the record.
- The present bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 61 of 2024, under Sections 307, 376(3), 506 I.P.C. and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Bindki, District Fatehpur during the pendency of the trial.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is in jail since 2.3.2024 and has no criminal history. In case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate with the trial.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/31408/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court