Dismissed¶9

Nadeem v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2026BAIL/31277/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nadeem v. State of U.P., Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31277 of 2025, decided April 23, 2026 by Ashutosh Srivastava, J. Bail application dismissed as withdrawn / not pressed by applicant's counsel (Manoj Kumar Tripathi); G.A. appeared for the State of U.P. Procedural withdrawal order only - no ratio, no merits considered, no statutes or precedents cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

Nadeem Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31277 of 2025

¶3

Nadeem

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manoj Kumar Tripathi, Tirpathi	Vinod Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 68

¶7

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶8

Shri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant at the very outset submits that he does not want to press this bail application and the same be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶9

On the bereavement made by the learned counsel for the applicant the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn .

¶10

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶11

April 23, 2026

¶12

Deepak/

¶13

Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nadeem v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Nadeem v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash vs State of U.P.

Farhat Rafiq vs State of U.P.

Mohd Shadab vs State of U.P.

Pavitra Dixit Vs State of U.P.

Anand Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P.

Akhil Srivastava vs State of U.P.