Vipin v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30948 of 2026 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Aushim Luthra, learned counsel for the applicant who has filed supplementary affidavit which is taken on record, Sri Uma Shankar Mishra, learned AGA for the
Disposed 22 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30948 of 2026
Vipin
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Aushim Luthra, Harishchandra Yadav, Utkarshni Singh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 67
HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. Heard Sri Aushim Luthra, learned counsel for the applicant who has filed supplementary affidavit which is taken on record, Sri Uma Shankar Mishra, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that during investigation, section 5j(ii)/6 POCSO Act has been added and bail application of the applicant has been rejected in the aforesaid section by the learned Special Court and he seeks permission to make necessary correction in the prayer clause.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/30948/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court