Disposed¶18

Nishant Chaudhary v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Feb 2026BAIL/2989/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court bail application procedural order — applicant absent even in revised call — Trial Judge directed to send fresh status report of trial — date of charge framing — prosecution witnesses proposed and examined with dates — adjournments with reasons — listing 27.2.2026 among top twenty cases — Registrar (Compliance) to communicate order by e-mail/FAX — Nishant Chaudhary v. State of U.P. — Krishan Pahal, J. — no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief on bail; only procedural directions issued — Trial Judge to send a fresh status report of the trial and the application listed along with the report on 27.2.2026 among the top twenty cases. ¶18

Nishant Chaudhary vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Status of the trial of the present case before the trial court, including the date of framing of charge, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, and adjournments with reasons, to be reported by the Trial Judge.

¶12

Court's answer

The learned Trial Judge was directed to forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the specified details in tabulated form (date of charge framing; number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed; witnesses examined with dates; adjournments with reasons).

¶12

Ratio / Principle

The Trial Court need not send the aforesaid details if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result must be mentioned.

¶17

Key takeaways

The bail application was directed to be placed along with the report on 27.2.2026 in the daily cause list among the top twenty cases.ratio¶18
A copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.) — Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2989 of 2026, Nishant Chaudhary v. State of U.P., order dated February 6, 2026. None appeared for the applicant even in the revised call. The Court directed the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering: (i) the date on which the charge was framed; (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet; (iii) the names and number of prosecution witnesses examined before the trial court with dates; and (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned, with reasons. If the trial has been decided, the Trial Court need only mention the date of disposal and the result. The application, along with the report, was directed to be placed on 27.2.2026 in the daily cause list among the top twenty cases, and a copy of the order was to be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. No statute or precedent was cited; no substantive adjudication on bail was made.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2989 of 2026

Nishant Chaudhary

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Madan Ji Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 66

¶10

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶11

None is present on behalf of the applicant even in the revised call.

¶12

Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-

¶13

(i) Date on which the charge was framed.

¶14

(ii) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.

¶15

(iii) Names and number of prosecution witnesses who have been examined before the trial court with dates.

¶16

(iv) Number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned along with the reason for the adjournment.

¶17

(v) The Trial Court need not send the aforesaid details, if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result be mentioned.

¶18

Place this application along with report on 27.2.2026 in the daily cause list among top twenty cases.

¶19

A copy of this order be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶20

February 6, 2026

¶21

Siddhant

¶22

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶23

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nishant Chaudhary v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nishant Chaudhary v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nikhil Alias Nikki vs State of U.P.

Subhan Khan @ Baniya vs State of U.P.

Bhaiyava @ Ram Bhawan vs State of U.P.

Manraj Kumar @ Chhotu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Fardeen vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Imran vs State of U.P. and 3 Others