Disposed¶11

Akash v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Jan 2026BAIL/2607/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Court No. 70; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 2607 of 2026; Akash v. State of U.P.; decided January 27, 2026 by Santosh Rai, J. Applicant's counsel: Jalaj Singh; for the State: G.A. and AGA Sri Om Prakash Dwivedi. Pure adjournment/listing order: learned AGA sought time to obtain instructions; matter listed as fresh on 9.2.2026. No merits, issues, holdings, statutes or precedents; not citable for any proposition of law.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted at the request of the learned AGA to obtain instructions; matter directed to be put up as fresh on 9.2.2026. Bail application not decided on merits; no relief on bail granted or refused. ¶11

Akash vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2607 of 2026

Akash

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Jalaj Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 70

¶8

HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Om Prakash Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State-respondent are present.

¶10

Learned AGA seeks adjournment in order to obtain instructions in the matter.

¶11

Put up as fresh on 9.2.2026.

¶12

January 27, 2026 RA

¶13

(Santosh Rai,J.)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Akash v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Gupta vs State of U.P. and Another

Jeetu Sharma vs State of U.P.

Anand Sahai vs State of U.P.

Raju Alias Rajvir vs State of U.P.

Surendra Ram vs State of U.P.

Saddam vs State of U.P.