Disposed¶7

Ram Bharat Maurya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2026BAIL/226/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 226 of 2026; Ram Bharat Maurya vs State of U.P.; Justice Santosh Rai; order dated 08.01.2026; adjournment order; A.G.A. sought time to obtain instructions; matter listed fresh on 20.01.2026; no merits decided; no citations; counsel for applicant Ratnendu Kumar Singh; G.A. for opposite party.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ram Bharat Maurya vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 226 of 2026

¶3

Ram Bharat Maurya

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) :	Ratnendu Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :	G.A.
Court No.- 70

¶6

HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. seeks time to obtain instructions. 2. Put up on 20.01.2026 as fresh.

(Santosh Rai,J.)

January 8, 2026

Aiman

Digitally signed by :- AIMAN FAROOQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Bharat Maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ram Bharat Maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Jaiswal vs State of U.P.

Vandana Singh vs State of U.P.

Nazma @ Nazmi @ Nazmeen vs State of U.P.

Tufail Ahmad vs State of U.P.

Sudhir Singh vs State of U.P.

Ravi Chauhan vs State of U.P.