Disposed¶8

Sumit Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Jan 2026BAIL/2096/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sumit Kumar v. State of U.P.; HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2096 of 2026; Court No. 70; Hon'ble Santosh Rai, J.; order dated January 21, 2026; adjournment at request of learned A.G.A. awaiting instructions; matter put up fresh on 4.2.2026; purely procedural order, no merits adjudicated, no ratio.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sumit Kumar vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2096 of 2026

¶3

Sumit Kumar	.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Pramod Kumar Maurya, Ram Soorat : G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 70

¶5

HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant is present.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. informs that he has not received instructions.

¶8

On the request of learned A.G.A., put up on 4.2.2026 as fresh to enable him to obtain instructions in the matter.

(Santosh Rai,J.)

January 21, 2026

Jaideep/-

Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sumit Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sumit Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saddam vs State of U.P.

Anar Singh vs State of U.P.

Reshampal and Another vs State of U.P.

Rinkoo and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Manoj Kumar vs State of U.P.

Kavya Sharma @ Vihaan Sharma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others