Disposed¶8

Suhel v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC13 Mar 2026BAIL/1815/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suhel; State of U.P.; Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1815 of 2026; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Court No. 13; Justice Saurabh Lavania; impleadment of victim; notice to private opposite parties; three working days; SHO Police Station Rehra Bazar; District Balrampur; learned AGA affidavit; listing 10.04.2026; interim bail order; Vivek Kumar Verma; Pallavi Vatsala; Shalini Gupta; G.A.

What did the court decide?

Interim order only: impleadment of the victim permitted; notice ordered to the private opposite parties (steps within three working days); SHO of P.S. Rehra Bazar, District Balrampur and learned AGA given communication/affidavit directions; case listed on 10.04.2026 alongwith service report. The bail prayer itself was not decided at this stage. ¶8

Suhel vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Bail application of applicant Suhel versus State of U.P. and others: at this interim stage the Court dealt with impleadment of the victim and service of notice on the private opposite parties, with substantive consideration of the bail prayer deferred to the next listing.

¶8

Court's answer

Prayer to implead the victim acceded as innocuous and unopposed by learned AGA; applicant's counsel permitted to implead the victim in the array of parties of the application during the course of the day.

¶8

Ratio / Principle

Notice to be issued to the private opposite parties; steps in this regard to be taken within three working days.

¶9

Key takeaways

Case to be listed on 10.04.2026 alongwith service report.ratio¶10
SHO of Police Station Rehra Bazar, District Balrampur directed to inform the private opposite parties of the date fixed in the case.ratio¶11
Learned AGA directed to communicate this order to the SHO concerned forthwith.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 13 — Saurabh Lavania, J., 13.03.2026: Interim order in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1815 of 2026 (Suhel v. State of U.P. through Addl. Chief Secy., Home Deptt., Lko. and 3 others; matter connected with P.S. Rehra Bazar, District Balrampur). The prayer of applicant's counsel to implead the victim was acceded as innocuous and unopposed by learned AGA, with liberty to implead the victim in the array of parties the same day. Notice was ordered to the private opposite parties, steps to be taken within three working days. The SHO of P.S. Rehra Bazar was directed to inform the private opposite parties of the fixed date; learned AGA was directed to communicate the order to the SHO forthwith and to file a response affidavit annexing proof of the information given by the SHO when the case is next listed. Case listed on 10.04.2026 alongwith service report. No statute or precedent is cited; the merits of the bail prayer were not considered in this order.

Suhel v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suhel v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahban Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Smt. Bandana Singh vs U.O.I Thru. Its Secy. Ministry of Communication New Delhi and 2 Others

Anupam Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. and 4 Others

Kallu @ Kalu Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Mukesh Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Sarita Nishad and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Lko. and 3 Others