Disposed¶17

Panna Vishwakarma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC31 Mar 2026BAIL/17819/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court interim order in bail application (Panna Vishwakarma v. State of U.P. & 3 others, Krishan Pahal, J., 31.03.2026) calling upon the trial court to report trial status: date of framing of charge, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, witness attendance and adjournments with reasons; exemption where trial concluded; matter listed 07.05.2026; order to be transmitted via District Judge/Registrar (Compliance); themes: trial monitoring, expeditious trial, witness examination, adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions issued: Trial Judge to furnish a tabulated status report on the trial; matter listed for 07.05.2026 along with the report; copy of the order to be conveyed to the Trial Judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance). ¶17

Panna Vishwakarma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The learned Trial Judge is directed to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering (i) the date of framing of charge, (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates, and (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons; where the trial has been decided, only the date of disposal and the result need be mentioned.

¶11

Key takeaways

The matter is to be listed on 07.05.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report.ratio¶17
A copy of the order is to be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Hon'ble Krishan Pahal, J.), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 17819 of 2025, Panna Vishwakarma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others (order dated March 31, 2026): With the bail application pending and the list revised, the Court directed the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, specifying (i) the date on which the charge was framed, (ii) the number and particulars (name, nature such as eye witness or expert witness) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) the names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined before the trial court with dates, and (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned with reasons for adjournment. Where the trial has been decided, the trial court need send only the date of disposal and the result. The matter was listed for 07.05.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report, and the Registrar (Compliance) was directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by e-mail/FAX.

Panna Vishwakarma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panna Vishwakarma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Totaram vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ravi Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shambhu Chauhan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Alam vs State of U.P. and Another

Komal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Akash @ Chhotu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others