Ajeet Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Brief listing order granting permission to implead the victim and directing notice to private opposite parties and service reports.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1751 of 2026
Ajeet Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhakar Mishra, Gauri Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
- The prayer of applicant's counsel to implead victim in this application is acceded being innocuous in nature and not opposed by learned AGA. The applicant's counsel is therefore permitted to implead the victim of the case in the array of parties of this application during the course of the day.
- Issue notice to the private opposite parties Steps in this regard be taken within three working days.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ajeet Yadav
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/1751/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Satendra Verma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others
Ram Singh and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Edu. Lko. and 7 Others
Anand Mohan Pathak vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 7 Others
Vibhuti Shivam Dubey vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko.