Aamish vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16451 of 2026

Aamish

Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Abhishek
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 69

¶6

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶7

1. Heard Sri Abhishek, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri O.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶8

2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 71 of 2026, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317(2), 325 BNS and 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Khatauli, District Muzaffarnagar, during pendency of the trial.

¶9

3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has been languishing in jail since 19.3.2026. It is further submitted that FIR has been lodged against unknown and during investigation the applicant has been arrested and on his pointing out one knife is said to have been recovered and some mortal remains of slaughtered cows are said to have also been recovered. It is also submitted that the applicant is having criminal history, which has been duly explained in the memo of application. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.

¶10

BAIL No. 16451 of 2026

¶11

2

¶12

4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant and it is submitted that slaughtering instruments and some mortal remains have been recovered at the pointing out of the applicant.

¶13

5. FIR has been lodged against unknown and during investigation the applicant has been arrested and on his pointing out one knife is said to have been recovered and some mortal remains of slaughtered cows are said to have also been recovered, however there is no report of veterinary doctor available in the case diary. T he applicant is having criminal history, which has been duly explained in the memo of application.

¶14

6. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED .

¶15

7 . Let the applicant- Aamish involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions :-

¶16

(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

¶18

(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S.

¶19

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the

¶20

BAIL No. 16451 of 2026

¶21

3

¶22

witnesses are present in the trial court.

¶23

(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.

¶24

8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶25

9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

May 14, 2026

¶28

Abhishek

¶29

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aamish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aamish v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Javed Vs State of U.P.

Pinki Vs State of U.P.

Awadhesh Lodhi Vs State of U.P.

Ravishankar vs State of U.P.

Sunil Mishra vs State of U.P.

Rajan Tiwari @ Vishwajeet Tiwari vs State of U.P.