Anshul Sahu Vs State of U.P.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13926 of 2026

¶3

Anshul Sahu

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P.		....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Akhilesh Tripathi, Vinay Kumar	Shubham	Maurya,
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 68

¶7

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶8

Heard Shri Akhilesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Punit Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶9

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Anshul Sahu, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 396 of 2025, under Sections 316(5), 61(2)(A), 317(2), of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Nawabad, District Jhansi, in related to Criminal Case No. 50155 of 2025, during the pendency of the trial before the Court below.

¶10

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused-applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case crime number. It is further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 26.10.2025. The learned counsel contends that the charge-sheet has already been submitted against the applicant on 16.11.2025, and therefore, no further custodial interrogation is required.

¶11

It is also submitted that the Investigating Officer has already recovered a total amount of Rs.69,78,642/- from three bags during the course of investigation. The applicant has no criminal antecedents and is a lawabiding person. There is no likelihood of the applicant absconding or fleeing from the course of justice, nor is there any possibility of tampering with prosecution evidence in case he is released on bail. Hence, the

¶12

BAIL No. 13926 of 2026

¶13

2

¶14

applicant be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶16

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie , but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶18

Let the accused-applicant, Anshul Sahu, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶19

1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶20

2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶21

3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and cooperate in the trial.

¶22

4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶23

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶24

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶25

May 5, 2026

¶26

Vibha Singh

¶27

Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anshul Sahu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshul Sahu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritik Tiwari @ Ranu vs State of U.P.

Asif Khan vs State of U.P.

Ritik Tiwari @ Ranu vs State of U.P.

Smt Zeenat vs State of U.P.

Deepak Vs State of U.P.

Kunal Vs State of U.P.