Shamshad Alias Molhu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC8 Apr 2026BAIL/13653/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13653 of 2025 (Shamshad Alias Molhu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others), Krishan Pahal J., 08.04.2026 - no appearance for applicant; trial judge directed to send tabulated report on trial status and delay (charge framing, witnesses proposed/examined, adjournments); listed 30.4.2026; copy of order to trial judge via District Judge by e-mail/FAX; bail not decided on merits; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

The learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report, in tabulated form, on the status of the trial and the cause for delay in concluding the trial of the present case. ¶¶11

Shamshad Alias Molhu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

¶¶17

Issue for consideration

Status of the pending trial against the applicant and the cause for delay in concluding it, to be reported by the trial court in the pending bail application.

¶¶11

Court's answer

The learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report, in tabulated form, on the status of the trial and the cause for delay in concluding the trial of the present case.

¶¶11

Ratio / Principle

The report shall specify: (i) the date on which the charge was framed; (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet; (iii) the prosecution witnesses examined before the trial court with dates; and (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned, with the reason for adjournment.

¶¶13

Key takeaways

If the trial has already been decided, the trial court need not send the aforesaid details, but must state the date of disposal and the result.ratio¶¶16
The case is to be listed on 30.4.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report.ratio¶¶17
A copy of the order is to be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13653 of 2025, Shamshad Alias Molhu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, order dated 08.04.2026: With the list revised and none appearing for the applicant, the Court directed the learned Trial Judge concerned to forthwith send a fresh report, in tabulated form, on the status of the trial and the cause for delay in concluding it, covering (i) the date of framing of charge, (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) the prosecution witnesses examined with dates, and (iv) adjournments with reasons; where the trial stands decided, only the date of disposal and the result need be mentioned. The case was listed for 30.4.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report, and a copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the trial judge through the learned District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. The bail application was not decided on merits.

Shamshad Alias Molhu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamshad Alias Molhu v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Arman Ansari vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sharafat Ali vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ramsamujh Sharma vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ishu Son of Anil Kumar vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Home Gov. of U.P. at Lucknow and 3 Others

Sanjay Lodhi vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Praveen Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others