Disposed¶10

Radhey Shyam v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Apr 2026BAIL/12695/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application adjourned, not decided on merits; post mortem report could not ascertain cause of death of deceased; viscera preserved; AGA granted ten days to seek instructions on viscera report and file compliance affidavit if received; case listed fresh on 27.4.2026; applicant stated to be father-in-law of the deceased; Radhey Shyam v. State of U.P.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12695 of 2026; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Sameer Jain, J.; dated April 16, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment: ten days' time granted to the learned AGA to seek instructions on the viscera report of the deceased and, if received, to file it through a compliance affidavit; case to be listed again as fresh on 27.4.2026. ¶10

Radhey Shyam vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12695 of 2026

¶3

Radhey Shyam

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ajay Kumar Pandey, Jaideep Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 66

¶7

HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

¶8

Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vijay Kumar, learned AGA-I, learned AGA, for the State, are present.

¶9

At the very outset, learned AGA submits that however, applicant is father-in-law of the deceased but from the post mortem report of the deceased it reflects that cause of death of the deceased could not be ascertained and, therefore, her viscera was preserved but till date he could not receive the instruction in the matter with regard to viscera report of the deceased. He prays for and is granted ten days time to seek instruction in the matter with regard to viscera report of the deceased and if viscera report of the deceased has been received then learned AGA shall file the same through compliance affidavit.

¶10

Put up this case again as fresh on 27.4.2026.

¶11

(Sameer Jain,J.)

¶12

April 16, 2026 SKM

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Radhey Shyam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhey Shyam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Parihar vs State of U.P.

Lalit vs State of U.P.

Deepak Singh vs State of U.P.

Vishal Sharma Urf Puchchi and Another vs State of U.P.

Akash Sonkar vs State of U.P.

Anil Kumar vs the State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary Home