Sahil vs State of U.P.

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 334 of 2025, under Sections 8/21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Chilkana, District Saharanpur.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that about 106.10 Gram of Smack is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant which is below the commercial quantity. In fact no such recovery was effected from the applicant. It is further submitted that since such recovery is not supported by independent witness, possibility of his false implication in the crime cannot be ruled out. It is next contended that in the present case the prosecution has failed to follow strictly the provisions of Section 50 and 57 of the N.D.P.S. Act. There is no report of chemical analyst. It is also argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and victimize him. The applicant is in jail since 28.11.2025. He submits that the applicant is having criminal history of one another case to his credit which has been explained in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He submits that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty

¶11

BAIL No. 1265 of 2026

¶12

2

¶13

of bail.

¶14

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pretrial stage who is involved in supplying contraband, therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activity.

¶15

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶16

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant, Sahil , involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶17

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶18

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶19

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶20

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶21

January 28, 2026

¶22

pks

¶23

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶24

Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sahil v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Prakash vs State of U.P.

Shanoo Vs State of U.P.

Sharafat vs State of U.P.

Maya Nishad vs State of U.P.

Vikas Trivedi vs State of U.P.

Vikas Trivedi vs State of U.P.