Pankaj Singh Vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11106 of 2026

Pankaj Singh .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manvendra Narain Pathak, Ram Krishna Paramhans Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjeev Kumar Singh Court No. - 70

¶3

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶5

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 20 of 2006, under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 191(2), 109(1), 125, 351(3) and 352 of B.N.S., P.S. Sikariganj, Distrtict-Gorakhpur, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to village factional politics. He next submitted that as per first information report general role of assault with lathi-danda and stones has been assigned to four named accused and two unidentified persons, including applicant. He further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. He also submitted that no injury was caused by the applicant during alleged incident. He lastly submitted that the applicant, who is in jail since 18.12.2025 and has no criminal antecedents to his discredit is entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial.

¶7

Per contra learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that grievous injuries have been caused to the injured Ranvir Pratap Singh. The details of the injuries are at page nos. 29 to 33, which reads as under:-

¶8

BAIL No. 11106 of 2026

¶9

2

¶10

S.N	. Injury Detail	Injury number	Pictorial depiction
1.	A CONTUSION OF SIZE 3 CM X 2 CM, 7 CM ABOVE LEFT EAR WITH COMPLAINT OF SEVERE HEADACHE AND VERTIGO, NCCT HEAD ADVISE.	1	No
2.	A REDDISH BRUISE OF SIZE 17 CM X 14 CM BELOW RIGHT SCAPULA, CHEST X-RAY AP / VIEW ADVISE.	2	No
3.	A REDDISH BRUISE OF SIZE 13 CM X 7 CM, 20 CM BELOW LEFT SCAPULA, CHEST X-RAY AP / VIEW ADVISE.	3	No
4.	A REDDISH BRUISE OF SIZE 7 CM X 5 CM OVER LEFT SCAPULA, CHEST X-RAY AP / VIEW ADVISE.	4	No
5.	A CONTUSION OF SIZE 8 CM X 3 CM, 4 CM BELOW LEFT SHOULDER JOINT ON BACK OF LEFT UPPER ARM X-RAY ADVISE.	5	No
6.	A CONTUSION OF SIZE 5 CM X 3 CM, 4 CM BELOW RIGHT SHOULDER JOINT ON BACK OF RIGHT UPPER ARM, X-RAY ADVISE.	6	No
7.	COMPLAINT OF SEVERE PAIN AND SWELLING ON BILATERAL HAND X-RAY ADVISE.	7	No
8.	COMPLAIN OF SEVERE BACK PAIN WITH UNABLE TO STAND, X-RAY LS SPINE ADVISE.	8	No
9.	A REDDISH ABRASION WITH CONTUSION OF SIZE 4 CM X 2 CM, 13 CM BELOW RIGHT KNEE JOINT ON LEG X-RAY ADVISE	9	No
10	A REDDISH CONTUSION OF SIZE 6 CM X 2 CM, 5 CM BELOW LEFT KNEE JOINT ON LATERAL SIDE OF LEFT LEG, X-RAY ADVISE.	10	No

¶11

3

¶12

BAIL No. 11106 of 2026

¶13

A REDDISH CONTUSION OF SIZE 9 CM X 6 CM OVER 11 No LEFT LATERAL MALLEOLUS, X-RAY ADVISE.

¶14

Learned A.G.A. further submitted that as per C.T. Scan report, Brain - "Hyper attenuating blood densities are seen in right anterior frontal lobe region suggestive of haemorrhagic cerebral parenchymal contusion with hematoma. Parfalive subdural hemorrhage is also seen in anterior pelvic region." Bone window - "Fracture of the linear table left temporal bone is seen."

¶15

Head injury as described above.

¶16

As per X-ray report "fracture of tibia bone of right leg is seen."

¶17

Having considered the nature of the injuries sustained by the injured Ranvir Pratap Singh, this Court is not inclined to enlarged the applicant on bail, accordingly, the bail application is rejected.

¶18

(Harvir Singh,J.)

¶19

April 9, 2026

¶20

Faridul

¶21

Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pankaj Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin Yadav vs State of U.P.

Mohd Akarm @ Rahul vs State of U.P.

Shadab Vs State of U.P.

Brajkishore @ Bhamarpal @ Bhawarpal Vs State of U.P.

Heeralal @ Vijay @ Bandar vs State of U.P.

Tausif vs State of U.P.