Disposed¶16

Shailendra @ Shailesh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Mar 2026BAIL/10452/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application interim order; Allahabad High Court; Krishan Pahal, J.; Shailendra @ Shailesh v. State of U.P.; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 10452 of 2026; trial status report called from trial court; date of framing of charge; prosecution witnesses proposed and examined; adjournments with reasons; listing on 24.04.2026; communication via Registrar (Compliance); no merits decision; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only: the trial court to submit a fresh tabulated status report on the trial; matter listed on 24.04.2026 with the report; copy of the order to be conveyed to the Trial Judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance). The bail application was not finally decided. ¶16

Shailendra @ Shailesh vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Ratio / Principle

The learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering (i) date of framing of charge, (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed as per the charge sheet, (iii) prosecution witnesses examined with dates, and (iv) appearances and adjournments with reasons; if the trial has been decided, the date of disposal and result suffice instead.

¶10

Key takeaways

The matter is to be listed on 24.04.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report.ratio¶16
A copy of the order is to be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10452 of 2026, Shailendra @ Shailesh v. State of U.P., order dated March 26, 2026: interim direction in a pending bail application. The learned Trial Judge was directed to forthwith send a fresh tabulated report on the status of the trial, detailing (i) the date of framing of charge, (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) the prosecution witnesses already examined with dates, and (iv) appearances and adjournments with reasons; where the trial stands decided, only the date of disposal and result need be mentioned. The matter was listed for 24.04.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report, and a copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the Trial Judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. No statute or precedent was cited and no issue was decided on merits.

Shailendra @ Shailesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra @ Shailesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Faizan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Karan Kumar Alias Sonu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ramraj vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nankoo vs State of U.P.

Mujammil vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vishal @ Isteyaq vs State of U.P. and 3 Others