Disposed¶11

Chandrawati Devi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Jan 2026BAIL/1002/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Adjournment-only order in bail application: applicant absent, AGA present; case passed over on Bar's request against adverse orders; listed fresh on 29.01.2026; Allahabad High Court, Sameer Jain, J.; Chandrawati Devi vs State of U.P.; no ruling on merits.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; case passed over at the Bar's request and directed to be put up again as fresh on 29.01.2026. ¶11

Chandrawati Devi vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1002 of 2026

Chandrawati Devi

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ajeet Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 67

¶8

HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

¶9

Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA for the State is present.

¶10

Considering the fact that today there is request of Bar not to pass any adverse order, in the interest of justice, the case is passed over.

¶11

Put up this case again as fresh on 29.01.2026.

¶12

January 16, 2026 AK Pandey

¶13

(Sameer Jain,J.)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrawati Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrawati Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P.

Ravi Kumar vs State of U.P.

Parvez vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivpujan vs State of U.P.

Nitesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Indresh vs State of U.P.