Dinesh Kumar Gupta and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 23, Rajeev Bharti, J.: anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. (No. 2568 of 2024), Dinesh Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr., dismissed for want of prosecution on February 24, 2026 owing to non-appearance of applicants and absence of any adjournment request; interim order, if any, vacated; no substantive consideration of bail merits. Counsel: Pradeep Kumar Shukla for applicants; G.A. for opposite parties.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared for the applicants to press it and no adjournment was sought. ¶13