Dismissed¶13
Raj Dulari v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/2213/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Raj Dulari v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 23, Rajeev Bharti, J., 24-02-2026): anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution for non-appearance of the applicant; interim protection vacated. Counsel: Dileep Kumar Pathak for applicant; G.A. for opposite parties. No issues framed, no precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press it and no adjournment was sought. ¶13