Disposed¶18

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Yadav and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC30 Mar 2026A482/8100/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 application No. 8100 of 2025, Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P.; extension of interim order allowed till next date of listing; mediation pending, Mediation Centre date 10.4.2026; no objection by opposite party no.2 and State/AGA; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Court No. 15; single judge Brij Raj Singh, J.; decided March 30, 2026; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Extension of interim order allowed: the interim order granted earlier, if any, in Application U/S 482 No. 8100 of 2025 shall continue till the next date of listing; the extension application stands disposed of. ¶18

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Yadav and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8100 of 2025

¶3

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Yadav And 4 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another

¶7

ome o. n noter	....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Amar Nath Dube Dubey, Ashok Srivastava, Srivastava	y, Ankit Kumar Avinash
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A., Ashok Srivastava, Pragya	Kumar Bhushan

¶8

Court No. - 15

¶9

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶10

(I.A. No.NIL of 2026-Extention of Interim Order)

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2.

¶12

This application for extension of interim order filed today is taken on record.

¶13

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that the interim order could not be extended, though the mediation proceedings are pending between the parties and the date fixed in the matter before the Mediation Centre is 10.4.2026. Learned counsel prays that interim order may be extended till the next date of listing.

¶14

Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection.

¶15

The interim order granted earlier, if any, shall continue till the next date of listing.

¶16

A482 No. 8100 of 2025

¶17

¶18

The application stands disposed of .

¶19

March 30, 2026

¶20

Sachin

¶21

(Brij Raj Singh,J.)

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Yadav and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Yadav and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Singh Surya Kumar Chandel and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Ajay and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Vinay Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Anupam Shukla @ Anupam Kumar Shukla and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Ayush Aggarwal vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Ghirau Yadav @ Ghirre vs State of U.P. Thru. the Addl. Chief Secy. U.P. Lko. and 8 Others