Sara Singh @ Shera Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh and 7 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4891 of 2026

¶3

Sara Singh @ Shera Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh And 7 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 13

¶8

HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.

¶9

Vakalatnama filed by Shri Praveen Kumar, Advocate, on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.

¶11

By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed to quash the summoning order dated 13.08.2015 and charge sheet dated 14.01.2015 (State Vs. Sara Singh @ Shera Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime no. 768/2014 under section 498-A, 452, 504, 506 IPC and 3 / 4 D.P Act, Police Station Ajgain, DistrictUnnao, pending in the court of C.J (J.D) FTC ( CAW ) Unnao, in the light of compromise dated 27.11.2025

¶12

The learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged against the applicants and thereafter the parties sat together and has amicably settled their dispute which has been reduced in writing on 27.11.2025. He added that thereafter the applicants filed the instant application for direction to the trial Court to verify the compromise deed and in compliance of the order dated 16.01.2026, the verification was done and report has been submitted to this Court. He submits that further criminal proceeding in the instant matter would amount to harassment and thus the impugned criminal proceeding may be quashed.

¶13

Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the contention of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicable settled their dispute and the opposite party no. 2 has

¶14

A482 No. 4891 of 2026

¶15

2

¶16

no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 27.11.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 11.02.2026 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal case.

¶19

In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466

¶20

Accordingly, criminal proceedings with regard to quash the summoning order dated 13.08.2015 and charge sheet dated 14.01.2015 (State Vs. Sara Singh @ Shera Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime no. 768/2014 under section 498-A, 452, 504, 506 IPC and 3 / 4 D.P Act, Police Station Ajgain, District- Unnao, pending in the court of C.J (J.D) FTC (CAW) Unnao, are hereby quashed.

¶21

The compromise shall be part of this order.

¶22

The application is allowed accordingly.

¶23

Consigned to record.

¶24

(Praveen Kumar Giri,J.)

¶25

June 12, 2026

¶26

V. Sinha

¶27

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sara Singh @ Shera Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh and 7 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sara Singh @ Shera Singh @ Abhay Pratap Singh and 7 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amir vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others

Nanhe vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Mohd.Avid Alias Avid vs State of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Lavlesh Kumar and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Sachin Alias Sachin Rawat and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Home Secy. Lko. and Another

Mohd. Imran Ansari vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry of Home Affairs Lko. U.P. and 2 Others