Disposed¶14

Rohit and 4 Othesr v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Mar 2026A482/36041/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Adjournment order in a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application (Application U/S 482 No. 36041 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Court No. 75, Samit Gopal, J. Applicants Rohit and 4 others (counsel Atul Kumar Srivastava) absent; opposite party no.2 served personally (order dated 23.11.2024; office report dated 25.03.2026) but unrepresented; State represented by Birendra Pratap Singh. Last-opportunity adjournment with peremptory listing on 09.04.2026; no merits adjudicated, no holdings, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Matter adjourned as a last opportunity owing to non-appearance of the applicants, and directed to be listed peremptorily on 09.04.2026. ¶14

Rohit and 4 Othesr vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36041 of 2024

Rohit And 4 Othesr

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Atul Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 75

¶8

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶9

List revised.

¶10

No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶11

Notice issued to the opposite party no.2 vide order dated 23.11.2024 has been served personally as per office report dated 25.03.2026. Despite service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the opposite party no.2 even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list.

¶12