Disposed¶20

Vinay Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko.

Allahabad HC24 Mar 2026A482/2413/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail sureties — common personal bond and two sureties across multiple FIRs — Application u/s 482, Allahabad HC Lucknow Bench — Vinay Kumar v. State of U.P. (2413 of 2026, decided 24-03-2026) — three bail cases CC Nos. 264, 265, 266 of 2022, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, Sultanpur, Ss. 120B/409/420/427/467/468/471 IPC — follows Supreme Court order in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018, order dated 29.10.2018) — one personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two like sureties valid in all cases.

What did the court decide?

Permission to furnish one personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of the like amount in one case, to be treated as valid in all other cases in which bail orders have been passed. ¶20

Vinay Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2413 of 2026

Vinay Kumar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 16

¶8

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶10

By means of the instant applicant, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every three cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all 3 cases.

¶11

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in three cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :-

¶12

Case Crime No. 264/2022, under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 427, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

¶13

Case Crime No. 265/2022, under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 427, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

¶14

Case Crime No. 266/2022, under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 427, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

¶15

He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid

¶16

A482 No. 2413 of 2026

¶17

¶18

matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶19

Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra).

¶20

Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed.

¶21

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶22

March 24, 2026

¶23

V. Sinha

¶24

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vinay Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Pal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Syamata Prasad @ Syamta Prasad @ Mahaveer Prasad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko. and Another

Budhai and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Kiran Thakur vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko. and Another

Rajendra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Barati Lal and Another vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Home and another