Petitioner sought directions for the expeditious decision of a revenue case under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code. The Court directed the respondent to decide the case within three months after affording a hearing.
Direction given to decide case No.4115 of 2023 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 68 of 2026
Mohd. Nafees
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar And Others
| .....Respondent(s) | |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Dinesh Kumar Srivastava |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Mohan Singh |
| Court No.- 5 |
|---|
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
(Alok Mathur,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Sub Divisional Officer should decide the revenue case expeditiously?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Nafees
Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar
Others
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
