Smt. Hadisunnisha Vs Degree College Association and 6 Others

Sri Ravi Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for Degree College Association has submitted that several petitions have been filed against the order impugned and the same have been disposed of by this Court. He has placed copy of order dated 28.05.2019 passed in Matter under Article 227 No. 4438 of 2019 (Phool Chand Gupta and another v. Degree College Association Musaffarganj and another).

¶13

The said judgement dated 28.5.2019 is quoted hereinunder:-

¶14

"Heard Sri Azad Khan, learned counsel for the applicants. Sri Ravi Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel appears for the decree holder.

¶15

This application has been filed for setting aside the order

¶16

A227 No. 3657 of 2019

¶17

2

¶18

dated 29.3.2019, passed by the Ist Additional District Judge, Mirzapur in Execution Case No. 5 of 1981 arising out of O.S. No. 294 of 1968 (Degree College Association Vs. Shiv Narain Pandey and others).

¶19

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants have filed objection under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC before the court below on 18.8.2018 which was registered as Misc. Case No. 39 of 2018 and 37 of 2018 respectively. Pursuant to an application for transfer of the case, the Execution Case No. 5 of 1981 was transferred from the court of Special Judge (SC/ST), Mirzapur to the court of Ist Additional District Judge, Mirzapur but, other miscellaneous case including the aforesaid miscellaneous application Nos. 37 and 39 of 2018 were not transferred and the order dated 29.3.2019 was passed, whereby, the vacant possession of the property in dispute was directed to be given to the decree holder by issuance of memorandum of possession. It is the contention of learned counsel for the applicants that their valuable rights are affected.

¶20

However, it has been pointed out by Sri Ravi Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondentdecree holder that the applications have been individually filed by the applicants before the court below for staying of the order impugned dated 29.3.2019. This fact is not rebutted by the learned counsel for the applicants. Photo copies of these two applications bearing date of 2.5.2019 have been passed on to the Court by Sri Ravi Prakash Srivastava which are taken on record.

¶21

Since, the learned counsel for the applicants acknowledges that the aforesaid applications are pending, it would be appropriate to direct the court below to take expeditious decision on the aforesaid two applications dated 2.5.2019.

¶22

This application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid observations."

¶23

A227 No. 3657 of 2019

¶24

3

¶25

In such view of the matter, I do not find any good ground to take a different view of the matter.

¶26

Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file objection/application as has been done by the petitioners therein in the other connected matters, which have already been decided.

¶27

No order as to costs.

¶28

March 18, 2026 Ved Prakash

¶29

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

¶30

Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Hadisunnisha v. Degree College Association and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Hadisunnisha v. Degree College Association and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganga Prasad vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Manoj Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Somawati and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Mantu Sah and 5 Others Vs Union of India and Another

Ram Singh and Another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 15 Others

Umesh and 2 Others Vs Vinay Singh Yadav and 4 Others