Disposed¶14

Smt. Parvati Devi v. Hridayesh Kumar and Another

Allahabad HC6 Apr 2026A227/1572/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Parvati Devi v. Hridayesh Kumar & Anr. — Allahabad HC (Lucknow Bench), Matters Under Article 227 No. 1572 of 2026, Jaspreet Singh, J., 06.04.2026 — direction for expeditious final disposal of Civil Suit No.65 of 2020 (Order 7 Rule 1 CPC) before Civil Judge (JD) Court No.25, Sultanpur; notice to private respondents dispensed with; no merits examined; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Notice to the private respondents dispensed with; Civil Judge (Junior Division) North Court No.25 District Sultanpur directed to consider and finally decide Civil Suit No.65 of 2020 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing without unnecessary adjournments, without examining merits. ¶14

Smt. Parvati Devi vs Hridayesh Kumar and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

LUCKNOW

¶3

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1572 of 2026

¶4

Smt. Parvati Devi

¶5

.....Petitioner(s)

¶6

	Versus
Hridayesh Kumar And Another	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Riniki Yadav, Anju Vaishya, Rohit Verma :

¶7

Court No. - 8

¶8

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with.

¶11

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Civil Suit No.65 of 2020 under Order 7 Rule 1 CPC pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) North Court No.25 District Sultanpur.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) North Court No.25 District Sultanpur to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Civil Suit No.65 of 2020 under Order 7 Rule 1 CPC as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶13

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶15

April 6, 2026 Harshita

¶16

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Parvati Devi v. Hridayesh Kumar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Parvati Devi v. Hridayesh Kumar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Mohammad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

C/M Janta Primary Vidyalaya Thru. Manager Smt. Shalini Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. and 2 Others

Smt. Sadhna Singh and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Awadh Vihar Cooperative Housing Society Lko. Thru. Its Secy. Mohammad Ateeq vs Cooperative Tribunal U.P. Lko. Thru. Presiding Officer and 7 Others

Rajneesh Pratap Singh vs Prinicipal Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Krishna Dev Pandey Alias Krishna Dev vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 10 Others