Reena Singh and 6 Others v. Lal Ji Singh and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13025 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- " A . Issue a order or directing the direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Paschimi Ballia to decide the
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13025 of 2026
Reena Singh And 6 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lal Ji Singh And 2 Others | .....Respondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Alok Kumar Upadhyaya, Var Pratap Mishra |
Rai, Atul Kumar sha Singh, Vishwanath |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : |
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
- This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"A. Issue a order or directing the direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Paschimi Ballia to decide the suit no.1320 of 2016 (Lal Ji and others Versus Reena Singh and others) pending before him a stipulated period."
- Recently, the Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2024) 6 SCC 267 has held that Constitutional Courts should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. The Court further held that issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending. Relevant para 47.3 of the said judgment is extracted hereasunder :-
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A227/13025/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court