Susheel Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13022 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The matter of the petitioner was referred to the arbitration, wherein, an award was made. Against which, an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13022 of 2026
Susheel Kumar Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Mahesh Sharma, Suraj Yadav |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
- The matter of the petitioner was referred to the arbitration, wherein, an award was made. Against which, an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed, which was decided on 15.01.2008. Against which, an appeal was preferred under Section 37 which was decided on 19.01.2024. The plaintiff-petitioner had filed an execution case under Section 36 of the Act on 23.10.2024 which has been registered as Execution Case No. 27/70 of 2024, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for expediting the said execution case.
- Recently, the Apex Court, on 06.03.2025, in Periyammal vs. Rajamani, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 507 considering the earlier judgment of the Apex Court rendered in case of Rahul S. Shah v. Jindendra Kumar Gandhi reported in (2021) 6 SCC 418 had held that the execution proceedings should be concluded expeditiously. Relevant paragraphs are extracted hereasunder:-
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A227/13022/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court