Disposed

Sudhir Shah v. Anuj Mishra and 3 Others

Allahabad HC17 Sept 2026A227/13009/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage without issuing notice or calling for counter affidavits. It directed the court concerned to decide the pending application for violation of a temporary injunction after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months from production of the certified copy, without adjudicating the merits.

What did the court decide?

The court directed the court concerned to decide Civil Misc. Case No. 10 of 2025 under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC in accordance with law after hearing all affected parties, preferably within two months from production of the certified copy.

Sudhir Shah Vs Anuj Mishra and 3 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13009 of 2026

¶3

Sudhir Shah

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
Anuj Mishra And 3 Others		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	:	Akhilesh Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:

¶6

Court No. - 9

¶7

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

¶8

This is a plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial court. According to the petitioner's counsel, the defendants has violated the order of temporary injunction which has led to the filing of an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the said application.

¶9

As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Civil Misc. Case No. 10 of 2025 filed under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶10

With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of .

¶11

It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits.

¶12

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

¶13

September 18, 2026

¶14

A. V. Singh

¶15

Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sudhir Shah v. Anuj Mishra and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Shah v. Anuj Mishra and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases