The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the inaction of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate on a restoration application, finding from the record that the application had already been allowed and the suit was proceeding on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1072 of 2026
Kamla Pati Dubey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Ayodhya And Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Krishna Mohan Pandey |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Mohan Singh |
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
A227 No. 1072 of 2026
2
(Jaspreet Singh,J.)
March 12, 2026
Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for restoration was pending or had already been allowed by the authority below?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamla Pati Dubey
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Ayodhya And Others
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
