The order is thin; it merely grants time for filing a counter affidavit and does not decide the matter.
The order is thin; it merely grants time for filing a counter affidavit and does not decide the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9542 of 2024
Petitioner :- Dinkar Prakash Srivastava And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Estate Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Mehrotra,Maria Fatima Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] [A.R. Masoodi, J.]
Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dinkar Prakash Srivastava
And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Estate Deptt. Lko.
And 2 Others
Attau Rahman Masoodi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
