Km Sujata Vivek v. State of Up and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner did not appear when the case was called in the revised list; any interim order stood vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner did not appear when the case was called in the revised list; any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:3563
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6781 of 2024
Petitioner :- Km Sujata Vivek Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kishor Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
None for the petitioner even when the case is called in revised list.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 7.1.2025 SS
Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Km Sujata Vivek
State Of Up And 2 Others
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court