Writ petition challenging auction press notice of seized vehicle was withdrawn due to an interim stay order by the Special Judge. The Court dismissed the petition as not pressed, permitting petitioners to seek statutory remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 44221 of 2025
Kanchan Devi And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 39
HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
December 16, 2025 sailesh
(Arindam Sinha,J.)
(Satya Veer Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanchan Devi
Another
State Of Uttar Pradesh
2 Others
Arindam Sinha
Satya Veer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
