Baseem Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition listed as fresh; counsel for respondents directed to seek instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 42955 of 2025
Baseem Ahmad
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivanand Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manu Ghildyal
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
- Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for the respondents is directed to seek instructions in the matter.
- Put up this case as fresh on 18.12.2025.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Baseem Ahmad
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/42955/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court