The court noted the absence of the petitioner's counsel and passed the case over due to the need to re-list for fresh arguments for the fresh batch list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 42318 of 2025
Anwar @ Ayavar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Giri Ram Rawat, Indra Deo Mishra, Shri Ram (Rawat) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C.
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
List of fresh cases has been revised. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. However, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
In the interest of justice, the case is passed over.
Put up as fresh on 12.12.2025.
December 2, 2025 Sattyarth
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anwar @ Ayavar
State of U.P.
SARAL SRIVASTAVA
SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
