Writ petition sought mandamus for expeditious disposal of a pending succession/mutation case under the U.P. Revenue Code. Court directed opposite party no.2 to decide the case within three months after hearing all parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10447
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41307 of 2024
Petitioner :- Abhay Pratap Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
"Rule 34. Issue of Proclamation [Section 35(1)].
(1) x x x x
(2) x x x x
(3) x x x x
(5) x x x x
(6) x x x x
(7) The Tahsildar shall make an endeavour to decide the undisputed case of mutation within the period of 45 days from the date of the registration of the case and the disputed case of mutation within the period of 90 days and if the proceeding is not concluded within such period the reason for the same shall be recorded.
(8) x x x x"
(Brij Raj Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should a mandamus issue directing the opposite party to decide mutation Case No.3863 of 2023 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code within a stipulated period?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Abhay Pratap Singh And Another
State Of U.P.
Akhand Pratap
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
