Ravi Kant Dubey v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Time-bound disposal of pending mutation/succession case under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Key terms: mutation on succession; Section 33; Section 34; Section 35; Section 35(1); Rule 34(7), U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016; 45-day limit for undisputed and 90-day limit for disputed mutation cases; Tahsildar; writ of mandamus; stipulated period; three-month direction to decide pending revenue case; notice to opposite party no.3 dispensed with; Case No.1438 of 2024 / Computerised Case No.T202402030801438; Ravi Kant Dubey v. State of U.P.; Partvanta Devi; WRIT - C No. 41267 of 2024; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:10462; Allahabad High Court; disposed on 21.1.2025. Relevant when citing a precedent for directing revenue authorities to conclude undecided mutation cases within a fixed timeframe.
What did the court decide?
Direction to opposite party no.2 to decide pending Case No.1438 of 2024 (Computerised Case No.T202402030801438), Ravi Kant Dubey and others v. Partvanta Devi, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, in accordance with law, after hearing all parties concerned.