This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3614 of 2024
Petitioner :- M/S Veer Enterprises Thru. Prop. Shri. Ravi Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Pandey,Arjun Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Heard.
Let the petitioner's Counsel demonstrate from the agreement / work order or from the statutory provisions of the U.P. G.S.T. Act, 2017, that in view of the contract entered into between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2, the liability to pay the G.S.T. amount for the work performed by the petitioner was upon the opposite parties.
List/Put up this case after four weeks .
Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Lokesh Kumar
[Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.]
Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
M/S Veer Enterprises Thru. Prop. Shri. Ravi Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko
Rajan Roy
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court